On Fri, 2018-07-27 at 19:13 +0200, Barath Aron wrote: > I intend to cross-compile Python v3.6.6 to Threos ( https://threos.io > ) operating system. Threos is supports a quite large set from > POSIX and C89/C99. Unfortunately, Threos lacks fork(2), but > provides posix_spawn(3) instead. I already made some local changes > in posixmodule.c to compile due to some features are detected > as present but actually not supported, like HAVE_FORK -- I blame > autotools for this :-). I don't know, however, whether the Python > shall cross-compile without issues. > > My question is that the _posixsubprocess.c can be prepared to > use posix_spawn(3) instead of fork(2)? Maybe the UNIX/Linux version > can also benefit from it, see: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby- > team/ruby-posix-spawn
You might want to ask this on the python-dev mailing list. -- Jan Claeys -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
