On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 6:16 AM, Rhodri James <rho...@kynesim.co.uk> wrote: > On 16/07/18 20:58, Terry Reedy wrote: >> >> On 7/16/2018 1:27 PM, Jim Lee wrote: >> >>> 90% of the world *is* "beneath my notice" when it comes to programming >>> for myself. I really don't care if that's not PC enough for you. >>> >>> Had you actually read my words with *intent* rather than *reaction*, you >>> would notice that I suggested the *option* of turning off Unicode. I didn't >>> say get *rid* of Unicode. I didn't say make it *harder* to use Unicode. >>> Once again - reaction rather than reading. >>> >>> Obviously, the most vocal representatives of the Python community are too >>> sensitive about their language to enable rational discussion. >> >> >> My empirical observation is that the more abrasive posters get rewarded >> with more response, while my attempts to engage in rational discussion, >> without ad hominems, gets less. > > > I wouldn't disagree with you. Fortunately Jim has pulled the "storming off > in a huff rather than answer a question anyone actually asked" defence, so > we can go back to debating about important things like how to spell > assignment expressions. > > Oh wait... :-) >
+1 QOTD. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list