From: Chris Angelico <[email protected]>
On Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:08 PM, Jim Lee <[email protected]> wrote:
> There are three locals: a, b, and result. Since result cannot be assigned
> a value until the list comp has been evaluated, I would expect the comp to
> return a value of "None" for result. An argument could also be made for [1,
> 2, []], but one thing I would *not* expect is [1, 2] or [2, 1]...
Ahh, I see what you mean. Thing is, there's a definite difference between "this
is None" and "this doesn't have a value". The latter situation is indicated by
simply not having the local.
def f():
print("; ".join("%s=%r" % x for x in locals().items()))
a = 1
print("; ".join("%s=%r" % x for x in locals().items()))
b = 2
print("; ".join("%s=%r" % x for x in locals().items()))
The results may surprise you, or may not.
This part has nothing to do with the behaviour of locals inside a
comprehension, though. The important part is that, like me, you would like
comprehensions to represent a block of code inside the current function, not an
implicit nested function.
ChrisA
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-3
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
