On 2018-06-02 10:40:48 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote: > On Sat, 02 Jun 2018 09:32:05 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote: > > Also nope. It looks like NaNs just mess up sorting in an unpredictable > > way. Is this the intended behaviour or just an accident of > > implementation? (I think it's the latter: I can see how a sort algorithm > > which doesn't treat NaN specially would produce such results.) > > > Neither -- it is a deliberate decision
If it was a deliberate decicion I would say it was intentional.
hp
--
_ | Peter J. Holzer | we build much bigger, better disasters now
|_|_) | | because we have much more sophisticated
| | | h...@hjp.at | management tools.
__/ | http://www.hjp.at/ | -- Ross Anderson <https://www.edge.org/>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
