2018-04-03 16:15 GMT+03:00 Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com>: > Creating python2.bat and python3.bat instead would take up less > additional disk space and would not need to be modified every time you > reinstall a new release of the same minor version. > > Thank you!
> > This > > copy-rename works for me, but it will not work for someone who does not > > have administrative rights. > > They could put them under their user folder and add the folder to > their path, although that's creeping into power user territory. Then > again, they *are* using IPython... > > > p.s.: I know there is a `py` launcher under Windows, but is does not help > > in this situation. > > I don't understand. Is 'py -3' that much harder to type than 'python3' > when running in Windows? > IPython is only one of the examples, instead you can substitute Jupyter, subprocess. As I wrote before: > I have two options: > 1. To wriie a shell script for `py` under Linux. > 2. To copy-rename to python3 under Windows. > Both are easy, but a little bit strange to do. > which seems unnecessary. There is already `pip.exe`, `pip3.exe`, `pip3.6.exe` in Scripts sub-folder which in my opinion solve the same problem. With kind regards, -gdg -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
