On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 11:29 PM, Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com> wrote: > Under no circumstance is PersonB required to prove PersonA'a > assertions. The onerous is on PersonA.
Assertion: Rick doesn't know what "onerous" means. Under no circumstance is Rick required to prove me right. But he obliged anyway. Very kind of him. This has nothing to do with any sort of debate; I just thought it interesting. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
