On 2017-11-01, Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfr...@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 10:27:54 +0100, Karsten Hilbert ><karsten.hilb...@gmx.net> declaimed the following: > > >> >>I understand. Thank you for the explanation. This may seem >>like a dumb question: the actual address that gets corrupted >>varies from run to run (it may be the same "place" in the > > Since the process virtual memory space should be the same on each run
Not with modern OS kernels: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Address_space_layout_randomization -- Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ... My pants just went at on a wild rampage through a gmail.com Long Island Bowling Alley!! -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
