On 05/10/2017 14:13, Steve D'Aprano wrote:
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017 10:51 pm, bartc wrote:
Am I allowed to say that it all seems a bit of a mess?
You may or may not be pleased to learn that there's a push to create a "record
like" or "struct like" datatype for Python 3.7 or 3.8, tentatively called
a "Data Class" for now.
....
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0557/
Yeah, maybe (looks a bit over-ambitious to me; why is it necessary to
have typed fields? Or to do relative compares?)
But it reminds me a bit of the xkcd cartoon about the 14 competing
standards becoming 15...
--
bartc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
