Hi. Fredrik Lundh wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > The API reference isn't clear on whether parseString can only handle > > discrete bits of valid XML > > the documentation says that "parse" expects an XML document, > and that "parseString" is the same thing, but parses from a buffer.
OK, so it sounded a lot more ambiguous at 4am. :-) > it's probably easier to pass a BZ2File instance to "parse", It is easier to retrieve a remote file, and decompress and parse as separate steps. But I've been wondering if it would be faster / more efficient to do it without caching. > but if you > insist on doing incremental SAX parsing, the IncrementalParser class > might be what you need: That'll do the trick nicely. Thanks. Cheers, -- Pete -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
