On 2017-09-22 14:29, Nagy László Zsolt wrote: > >> Result: >> >> Traceback (most recent call last): >> File "C:/not_telling/c14n.py", line 16, in <module> >> short_empty_elements=False >> File "lxml.etree.pyx", line 1869, in lxml.etree._ElementTree.write >> (src\lxml\lxml.etree.c:57004) >> TypeError: write() got an unexpected keyword argument 'short_empty_elements' > Well, it looks like etree does not implement the short_empty_elements > argument in its write method: > > https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/master/src/lxml/etree.pyx#L1954 > > But it should (see > https://github.com/lxml/lxml/blob/master/src/lxml/etree.pyx#L5 - The > ``lxml.etree`` module implements the extended ElementTree API for XML. ) > > Can somebody please confirm that this is a bug? Also, how can I send a > bug report? ( I'm not able to add an issue to lxml, lack of permissions. ) >
https://docs.python.org/3/library/xml.etree.elementtree.html#xml.etree.ElementTree.ElementTree.write The argument was added in Python 3.4. Presumably, lxml implemented the API before this change. Maybe this would be considered a bug by lxml. Maybe it won't. http://lxml.de/ links to a bug tracker and a mailing list. -- Thomas Jollans -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
