On Friday, September 8, 2017 at 10:42:44 AM UTC-5, Steve D'Aprano wrote: > To be perfectly rational, we *should* consider at least > three alternatives: > > (1) Stick with Python 2 and pay for support; > > (2) Migrate to Python 3; > > (3) Re-implement in some other language; > > and make a dispassionate choice according to which one has > the best cost/benefit ratio. And that choice won't always > be #2.
Finally! A reasonable response. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
