Leam Hall <leamh...@gmail.com> writes: > I've read comments about Python 3 moving from the Zen of Python.
For what it's worth: I have done successful conversions of numerous code bases from Python 2 to Python 3, and that characterisation does not fit at all. The resulting code base is much more Pythonic. > I'm a "plain and simple" person myself. Complexity to support what > CompSci folks want, which was used to describe some of the Python 3 > changes, doesn't help me get work done. Exactly so. You should ignore the far too academic debates that flourish here, and concentrate only on the practical differences going from Python 2 to Python 3. Those alone make it worthwhile to learn Python 3. -- \ “Life does not cease to be funny when people die any more than | `\ it ceases to be serious when people laugh.” —George Bernard Shaw | _o__) | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
