On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 1:44 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > That gave me this result almost instantaneously: > > 4503599761588224 > > which has been rounded up instead of down. I don't know if that counts > as sufficiently wrong?
Oh, and I forgot to say: I have no actual *proof* that this is the lowest number for which this will occur. It does not occur with 4503599761588223 (the next lower integer), but could happen with something between two squares, for all I know. However, I suspect that it wouldn't. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
