On 15/06/17 15:10, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:00 AM, alister <alister.w...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Json is designed to be legal Javascript code & therefore directly
executable so no parser is posible.
"no parser is possible"???
I *think* alister meant "so it is possible to not use a parser
[library]" (i.e., parse the stream using JavaScript's parser via eval()
- though I agree with everyone else who has said this should never be done).
I may be wrong about what alister meant, but the language reminds me of
a German colleague of mine from a few years back who wrote in some API
update documentation "Specifying parameter X is no longer an option".
What he meant was "is now mandatory" or "is no longer optional". To a
native English speaker, it reads as "can no longer be used" which is the
opposite of what he meant ...
E.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list