On 15/06/17 15:10, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:00 AM, alister <alister.w...@ntlworld.com> wrote:
Json is designed to be legal Javascript code & therefore directly
executable so no parser is posible.


"no parser is possible"???

I *think* alister meant "so it is possible to not use a parser [library]" (i.e., parse the stream using JavaScript's parser via eval() - though I agree with everyone else who has said this should never be done).

I may be wrong about what alister meant, but the language reminds me of a German colleague of mine from a few years back who wrote in some API update documentation "Specifying parameter X is no longer an option". What he meant was "is now mandatory" or "is no longer optional". To a native English speaker, it reads as "can no longer be used" which is the opposite of what he meant ...

E.
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to