On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:09 AM, bartc <b...@freeuk.com> wrote: > But if I use tcc to compile /my/ byte-code interpreter, and then run the > interpreter on a computationally intensive benchmark (jpeg decoding), I get > these results for a given input file: > > Tiny C 6.7 seconds > gcc -O3 3.6 seconds > > So it is not that terrible. And there are also other, smaller compilers > which will generate better code than Tiny C. (I don't know why so many > bundle gcc with their language apps because is not exactly compact.)
Does Tiny C compile to all the platforms that gcc does? And if you want to support other platforms, what do you do? ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
