On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 1:02 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Slide 58: "Not going to lie to you. I still don't get this." Uh, sure, > > great sales pitch there. If the author doesn't understand asyncio, then > why > > include it in the list? > > IMO he doesn't understand it because he's aiming at Python 3.4. Aim at > 3.5 minimum and use "async def". Much easier. > > ChrisA > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > Agreed `async` and `await` in Py3.5 made it so much easier for me to understand the new async stuff. I've been toying around with aiohttp a bit and I can say it's actually fairly enjoyable. Doesn't have all the creature comforts I've enjoyed while working with Django in my day job, but I can see some fairly robust applications being created with aiohttp. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
