Bernd Nawothnig <bernd.nawoth...@t-online.de> wrote: > On 2017-04-13, Mikhail V wrote: > > On 13 April 2017 at 18:48, Ian Kelly <ian.g.ke...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> Now I wonder, have we already collected *all* bells and whistles of Python > >>> in these two examples, or is there something else for expressing trivial > >>> thing. > >> > >> Functions and exceptions are considered "bells and whistles"? > > > > You mean probably classes and exceptions? For me, indeed they are, > > but it depends. > > > > And breaking the code into def() chunks that are not > > functions but just chunks... I don't know, looks bad. > > Organising code in a bunch of small functions is by far better coding > style and better readable than put it all together in one chunk. And > that holds for all programming languages, not only for Python. > The functions need *some* reason for being an entity though.
-- Chris Green ยท -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
