On 03/29/2017 11:31 PM, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 2:19 PM, Rick Johnson
<rantingrickjohn...@gmail.com> wrote:
[...]
Really? How could your clients not notice 60 GB of memory
usage unless they are running some kind of mad-dog insane
top-of-the-line hardware? (Got Benjamins???) Of course, in
the case they are not DARPA scientist supported by a
viturally unlimited supply of tax dollars provided by the
endless toils of American slave-bots, how could they ignore
the thrashing? o_O
Did you read the project's README? This is a dramatic reduction from
the normal memory usage of this kind of job. So, yes, they *are* going
to have top-of-the-line hardware. If you're doing a job that normally
would require 256GB of RAM, and instead of being able to run in 40GB,
it needs 60GB, are you going to notice? You probably have 64GB or
128GB.
ChrisA
Actually, it is not memory, but time improvements. Most people won't run
models of the size of Spaun, so usually the memory requirements will be
much lower
Jan
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
