On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Chris Warrick <kwpol...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The other frameworks are simple to set up, too. I’ve personally had > Unicode issues with Bottle, and it doesn’t even do sessions. Unlike > Flask, or of course Django. > > Because, as the old saying goes, any sufficiently complicated Bottle > or Flask app contains an ad hoc, informally-specified, bug-ridden, > slow implementation of half of Django. > > (In the form of various plugins to do databases, accounts, admin panels > etc.) > I've found this to be the case whenever I see a Flask or Bottle project that does anything more than expose a data API. I think Flask is great for building small applications or microservices. Any more and you are essentially hacking together a bunch of packages that may or may not have been designed to work together. I find that Django can suit almost any use case perfectly well. You can use whatever part of the framework you want and toss out/replace any part you don't want. Plus, built in sessions and authentication are fantastic time savers. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
