On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Marko Rauhamaa <ma...@pacujo.net> wrote: > Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com>: >> Yeah, if it's just for progress status. Of course, that does assume >> that the run() function doesn't have anything particularly costly in >> it. If it does, well, dis gonna take a while.... > > Dealing with multigigabyte data streams is not over the top nowadays.
This is true, but ultimately, it all comes down to the run() function. With no further posts since the drive-by at the beginning, we have nothing solid to discuss this on. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
