[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Torsten Bronger wrote: >> I've been having a closer look at wxPython which is not Pythonic at >> all and bad documented. Probably I'll use it nevertheless. > Aye. Couldn't agree more.
You know, whenever someone mentions wxPython being badly documented, I have to wonder whether they know about the nearly 2000 page PDF of wxWidgets documentation, which is available in html at http://www.wxwidgets.org/manuals/2.6.1/wx_contents.html wxPython has the same API as wxWidgets, except where indicated in that manual. If in doubt, you can also consult http://wxpython.org/docs/api/ And of course, the gaps are filled in by the wxPython wiki: http://wiki.wxpython.org/ I apologize if you already know about these things, but I find myself continually surprised that "wxPython is badly documented" has become conventional wisdom when I have never found that to be the case. -- Brian -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
