On Thu, 29 Sep 2016 03:46 am, Chris Angelico wrote: > That's exactly how a function works in an imperative language, and > it's exactly what the FP advocates detest: opaque state. So is the > difference between "function" and "monad" in Haskell the same as "pure > function" and "function" in other contexts?
Honestly Chris, what's hard to understand about this? Monads are burritos. http://blog.plover.com/prog/burritos.html -- Steve “Cheer up,” they said, “things could be worse.” So I cheered up, and sure enough, things got worse. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
