On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 11:04:55 +0400, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, 12 Aug 2005 22:25:07 -0700 >Steve Jorgensen wrote: > >> Since Python does not use manifest typing, there's not much you can do about >> this, but typeless languages like this are great if you're using a process >> that finds the errors the compiler would otherwise find. I'm referring, of >> course, to Test Driven Development (TDD). >> >> If you do TDD, you won't miss compile-time checking much. In fact, the extra >> kruft that manifest typing requires is an annoying burden when doing TDD, so >> Python is a breath of fresh air in this regard. > >What test should one implement to catch that kind of errors like in OP >example? > >> On 10 Aug 2005 08:53:15 -0700, "Qopit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >#---- >> >def tester(a,b,c): >> > print "bogus test function",a,b,c >> >tester(1,2,3) #this runs fine >> >tester(1,2) #this obviously causes a run-time TypeError exception >> >#----
None - other tests you would write would fail if other code in your system is trying to call a procedure with the wrong number of parameters. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
