2016-08-09 12:06 GMT-07:00 Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>: > Juan Pablo Romero Méndez <jpablo.rom...@gmail.com> writes: > > In online forums sometimes people complain that they end up having to > > test constantly for None > > That's something of a style issue. You can code in a way that avoids a > lot of those tests (not all of them). >
This is exactly what I'm looking for :). Do you have any resource (blog / book, etc) that discusses this style? > > > Do you guys have any resources you like that addresses the following > > issue: What is the best way to use the dynamic features of Python to > > avoid having to write a poor's man type system? > > In practice dynamically typed code often is monomorphic anyway. > Dynamism shows up in things like deserializers. > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
