On 7 August 2016 at 16:54, Steven D'Aprano < steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> Seen in the office IRC channel: > > > (13:23:07) fred: near_limit = [] > (13:23:07) fred: near_limit.append(1) > (13:23:07) fred: near_limit = len(near_limit) > (13:23:09) fred: WTF > Assuming you'e not talking about the semantics of this specific code (which could be reduced to near_limit = 1), I have to say I've been guilty of reusing a name in precisely this way - set up the structure using the name, then set the name to a calculated value. I would only do this when I'm totally uninterested in the structure itself - it's purely a way to get to the final result, but getting to that final result requires several steps that justifies an intermediate name binding. It avoids namespace pollution (but of course that can be fixed with del) and avoids having to think up another name for a very temporary structure (names are hard). And I would include a comment explaining the reuse of the name. The alternative would be something like (replace first line by something complex ...): near_limit_list = [1] near_limit = len(near_limit_list) del near_limit_list Tim Delaney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
