On 2016-07-13, Michael Torrie <torr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/13/2016 03:46 AM, jonas.thornv...@gmail.com wrote:
>> It is not that the data is not compressible i just need more chunks
>> or random data, it is the footprint of the algorithm that has a
>> certain it is a structure afterall albeit richer in interpretation
>> than the numerical field.
Well, thanks for that. Not only was it authentic frontier
gibberish...
> Err, no, that does not apply to "random." If the data is truly
> random then it does not matter whether you have 5 bytes or 5 GB.
> There is no pattern to discern, and having more chunks of random
> data won't make it possible to compress.
You might as well be arguing with Ludwig Plutonium.
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! I wonder if I should
at put myself in ESCROW!!
gmail.com
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
