Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> writes: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 11:28 AM, Ben Finney <ben+pyt...@benfinney.id.au> > wrote: > > Pull requests. Code review. Issues. Integration with other services. > > All the social information around all of those interactions, and > > more. > > > > If *any* of that is valuable, then yes it's important that it not be > > locked to any one vendor. > > Exactly how important? Not so important as to stop slabs of Python > from migrating to GitHub, including its pull request system.
I maintain that it is important enough to stop that. The migration happened anyway, because not everyone is convinced of the importance of avoiding vendor lock-in of valuable data, over criteria such as “this person happens to like Vendor-locked Solution Foo”. There are other projects considering such a migration; I am hopeful they can still be reasoned with. -- \ “Begin with false premises and you risk reaching false | `\ conclusions. Begin with falsified premises and you forfeit your | _o__) authority.” —Kathryn Schulz, 2015-10-19 | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
