On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 6:06 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro <lawrenced...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Monday, July 4, 2016 at 12:02:23 PM UTC+12, Ian wrote: >> I'm talking about the docstring of the *decorator*, not func. > > *Sigh*. Originally somebody was complaining that the lambda version didn’t > allow for good (or any) docstrings. So I posted my version, and I went to all > the effort of ensuring that every generated function had a good docstring. > And now you are trying to knock me down for that? > > What the hell is wrong with you people?!?
Sorry. I don't know who that was or what they wrote, because your post is the first mention of docstrings that I see in this thread. Maybe you're thinking of some other thread. I don't read more than a fraction of what gets posted to this list. But I read your post and I saw a way to improve the code in it, so I suggested it. Next time I won't bother. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
