On 19/06/2016 15:35, Antoon Pardon wrote:
Op 12-06-16 om 23:10 schreef BartC:
On 12/06/2016 20:25, Ned Batchelder wrote:
Just as here there is no link between x
and y:
x = 12
y = x
(And that's a good illustration of why 'y' isn't a name reference to 'x', referring to
the "...ducks limp" thread. But best not to rake it up again...)
I find this rather inaccurate reference to what your opposition is
supposed to have states together with the remark best not to rake
this up again, rather disingenuous
Sorry, haven't been able to parse that.
What is inaccurate? What am I supposed to be opposed to? And why is it
disingenuous? The original thread is still open to posts AFAIK if
someone wants to discuss it further.
--
bartc
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
