On Friday, June 3, 2016 at 8:09:21 AM UTC+12, Rob Gaddi wrote: > Although your loop is really the _canonical_ use case for > > for loopvar in range(initial_value, limit+1): > processing > if found_what_im_looking_for: > break > else: > do_whatever_it_is_you_do_when_its_not_found
The reason why I don’t like this is that there are two ways out of the Python for-statement, and they are written quite differently. Why the asymmetry? Logically, all ways out of a loop are of equal significance. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
