Ned, 

At the risk of sounding like a naggy grandmother, I am not trying to argue with 
you (since it is pointless arguing over the internet with a stranger whom i 
don't know and I hate arguing) but It is important to note that whether there 
is a need/demand for a competitor or clone is not up to you or me to decide, it 
is up to the market and users to decide. If following your logic that there is 
no need for competition, then we would only have 1 search engine in the world. 
It is competition that creates real wealth in the world and improvement in 
people's lives. Before Google, there were already tons of search engines in 
existence like Yahoo and Altavista that had hundreds of millions if not 
billions of users. I am not sure exactly what special "sauce" that Google had 
that made it scale so fast so successfully and become the dominant search 
engine over others , but the point I was simply trying to make is that 
competition is a great thing in the free market, and that users are always willi
 ng to switch or use a new alternative if it is significantly better / 
different or novel (different design). Very few things are totally novel ... 
most technologies are copycats of one another. Even Steve Jobs, whom many would 
describe as the most creative tech innovator for the past 20 or 30 years 
probably stole / copied / cloned his ideas for his many inventions from various 
other sources (while constantly whining and accusing Microsoft and Bill Gates 
of ripping off his ideas lol). Amongst the "educational startup" sector, there 
are also several up and coming sites : 
http://www.inc.com/ilan-mochari/16-startups-that-will-disrupt-the-education-market.html
 and I predict that there will be demand for more similar sites in the future 
by users 


As Paul Graham mentioned : "Startups are often ruthless competitors, but 
they're competing in a game won by making what people want."


On Saturday, May 14, 2016 at 12:52:58 AM UTC+8, Ned Batchelder wrote:
> On Friday, May 13, 2016 at 12:05:33 PM UTC-4, Cai Gengyang wrote:
> > edx.org is a great example , perhaps a competitor / clone with different 
> > functionalities and better design , more videos, graphics , more 
> > interactive 
> 
> As I mentioned in a previous reply, edx.org runs on Open edX, which is
> open source, written in Python.  There's no need for a competitor/clone,
> you can use it as a starting point, and improve it how you like.
> 
> The content is completely up to the course designer, you can include
> whatever videos or graphics you like.  For interactives, we have have
> the XBlock API which lets you create new courseware components that
> work however you like.
> 
> --Ned.
-- 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to