On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 4:46:43 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote: > On 2016-04-28 06:16, Rustom Mody wrote: > > On Thursday, April 28, 2016 at 9:26:21 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > >> My rule of thumb is: Dunders are for defining, not for calling. It's > >> not a hard-and-fast rule, but it'll get you through 99%+ of > >> situations. > > > > Neat and clever. > > Should get in the docs somewhere > > > Is it worthy of being in the Zen of Python?
:-) Thats more than I intended... But heck why not?! I find that dunder methods are poorly documented, especially when compared to their 'pythonic-ness'. Ive spoken of this on and off, eg https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2015-May/691329.html -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
