Ethan Furman <et...@stoneleaf.us> writes: > On 04/17/2016 03:08 PM, Matt Ruffalo wrote: > > > That seems like a reasonable approach, though I think there *really* > > needs to be an option along the lines of "subscribed to the list for > > the purposes of moderation, but not receiving list messages via > > email". > > I don't understand what you are saying. > > If you are not receiving emails, how are you reading the list? A news > reader?
Another way is to receive messages to one email address, but to post using a different email address that should not receive those messages. E.g. the same person may wish to post as <al...@example.org>, but not receive messages to that address because they receive the same messages already at <al...@example.com>. > If you are subscribed for moderation, how does that help with the lag > time when you do post? I think that (using the above example) the wish is for *both* those addresses to be considered “subscribed for the purpose of moderation”, without that also entailing delivery of messages. -- \ “What is needed is not the will to believe but the will to find | `\ out, which is the exact opposite.” —Bertrand Russell, _Free | _o__) Thought and Official Propaganda_, 1928 | Ben Finney -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
