On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 8:42 AM, Random832 <random...@fastmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 1, 2016, at 09:24, Chris Angelico wrote: >> It is an iterable. It is not a factory, as that implies that you call >> it. > > I do have an objection to this statement. It's perfectly reasonable to > describe the factory pattern as applying to objects on which you call a > method to return the new object you are interested in. In this sense, > all collections are iterator factories.
I think the problem with that is that it implies something about the purpose of the object. Usually when we talk about the factory pattern, we're talking about an object that creates instances of something and does nothing else. So in that sense it's misleading to refer to dict or list or even range objects as "iterator factories", because they also do a lot of other things that are equally if not more important. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
