On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 12:08 AM, Antoon Pardon <antoon.par...@rece.vub.ac.be> wrote: > Op 31-03-16 om 13:57 schreef Chris Angelico: >> Okay. I'll put a slightly different position: Prove that your proposal >> is worth discussing by actually giving us an example that we can >> discuss. So far, this thread has had nothing but toy examples (and >> bogoexamples that prove nothing beyond that the author knows how to >> mess with Python - fun, but not a strong argument on either side). >> Give us some real meat to work with, instead of these drips of >> tantalizing blood. > > What a strange request. Whether or not something is worth discussing > is a personal judgement. So there can be no proof of such a thing. > I would say: judge for yourself and act accordingly.
Plonk. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
