I'd posted this to stdlib-...@python.org without realizing that that list is mostly dead.
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016, at 22:33, Random832 wrote: > I assume that everyone who has ever used imaplib is familiar with how > painful its output format is to deal with. I am wondering if anyone else > has any ideas on ways it can be extended in a backward-compatible way to > provide options for better parsing, handling unilateral data from the > server, processing data as it comes in, etc. Anyone have any thoughts? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
