On 14/03/2016 22:07, BartC wrote:
On 14/03/2016 21:23, Mark Lawrence wrote:
Python 2.8, RickedPython, and the latest entry into the race,
BartCPython, all vapourware.
I'm not creating a new version of Python or CPython (you should have
used an underscore).
But I do have considerable experience of creating dynamically-typed
languages and writing byte-code interpreters for them. They are not
vapourware.
Really? So why do you keep arguing, most notably with Steven D'Aprano,
about the benefits of dynamic typing, whereby you appear to be
completely against it?
The RUE kept stating that he was an expert in unicode, but never once
provided a single shred of evidence to support his claim. Until I see
substantiated evidence from you I am going to state quite cleary that
you've no idea, you're just another RUE. Your dreadful piece of code
published earlier today around a switch statement summed it up. When
are you running the profile that I asked for?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
