On 2016-03-10, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Jon Ribbens ><jon+use...@unequivocal.co.uk> wrote: >> On 2016-03-09, Chris Angelico <ros...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Then *get interested*. Unicode is the only way that you'll ever not be >>> parochially bound to a subset of English - or, worse, bound to an >>> arbitrary eight-bit codepage that you don't even control the choice >>> of, such that your program behaves differently on different systems. >>> FIX YOUR LANGUAGE and support non-English text. >> >> You can't even support English text properly without Unicode. >> Plenty of English words use non-ASCII characters: >> café, crêpe, façade, naïve, dæmon, etc. > > Like I said, a subset of English.
I profusely apologise for so rudely agreeing with you. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
