>> How do we reraise the exception in python , I have used raise not
>> sure how to reraise the exception
>
> raise with no arguments will reraise the exception currently being handled.
>
> except Exception:
> logging.error("something went wrong")
> raise
Thanks Ian for taking time and looking into the code , o k raise
keyword for raising exception is fine .
>>>> assert ret ==0,"ERROR (ret %d): " \
>>>> " \nout: %s\nerr: %s\n" % (ret, out, err)
>>>> except Exception as e:
>>>> print("Failed to run %s got %s" % (cmd, e))
>>>> return False
>>>> return True
>>>>
>>>> def prep_host():
>>>> """
>>>> Prepare clustering
>>>> """
>>>> for cmd in ["ls -al",
>>>> "touch /tmp/file1",
>>>> "mkdir /tmp/dir1"]:
>>>> try:
>>>> if not run_cmd_and_verify(cmd, timeout=3600):
>>>> return False
>>>> except:
>>>
>>> What exceptions are you expecting this to catch? run_cmd_and_verify
>>> already catches any expected exceptions that it raises.
In my case the exception is nothing but the error example if we plan
to run the command say #ifconfig -a and the command fails because of
a type ( say u ran #igconfig -a).
we will the output as
# Failed to run igconfig -a got Error (ret=127)
out :
error: command not found: igconfig
So the execption is the error i.e Error (ret=127) out : error: command
not found: igconfig, Iam fine with this behaviour.
>
> But that exception is already caught by the run_cmd_and_verify
> function, so what exception are you expecting to be caught *here*?
I wanted to run the command in a loop and have a fxn for the pattern
that repeats in this case the function is run_cmd_and_verify , the
only known way to me was using try with expect
I thought I will use try and have pass in except which you don't recommend
for cmd in ["ls -al",
"touch /tmp/file1",
"mkdir /tmp/dir1"]:
try:
if not run_cmd_and_verify(cmd, timeout=3600):
print "running command failed "
return False
except:
pass
> You should virtually never just pass in an exception handler. Either
> handle the exception, or log it and reraise it. If you're going to do
> neither of those things, then don't use a try-except at all.
What alternative do I have other than try-expect ? can try - else be
used for my case?
Regards,
GPal
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
