On 27/02/2016 20:03, BartC wrote:
On 27/02/2016 16:35, BartC wrote:
Any faster solutions would need to read more than one byte at a time.I've done some more test using Python 3.4, with the same 200,000 line 6MB test file: 0.25 seconds Scan the file with 'for line in f' 2.25 seconds Scan the file with your readlines() routine
That's not right. 0.25 seconds was for readlines(). 2.25 for a f.read(1) loop.
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
