Random832 <random...@fastmail.com>: > On Mon, Feb 22, 2016, at 14:32, Marko Rauhamaa wrote: >> urandom() is not quite random and so should not be considered >> cryptographically airtight. >> >> Under Linux, /dev/random is the way to go when strong security is >> needed. Note that /dev/random is a scarce resource on ordinary >> systems. > > http://www.2uo.de/myths-about-urandom/
Did you post the link because you agreed with the Web pamphlet? Marko -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
