Dennis Lee Bieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 21:37:54 -0400, Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> declaimed
> the following in comp.lang.python:
>> "The concensus of this group" is a *long* way from "the debate has
>> moved on". I agree that it's the concensus of this group - but this is
>> a group devoted to a dynamic programming language. If you go to a
>> group devoted to a statically typed language, you'll find a different
>> concensus. Which means the debate is still very much alive.
> For a schizoid view... read both comp.lang.ada and
> comp.lang.python together <G>
Will you settle for comp.lang.eiffel + the smalleiffel list and
comp.lang.python?
<mike
--
Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/
Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information.
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
