On Saturday, January 30, 2016 at 3:01:09 AM UTC+5:30, Rick Johnson wrote: > On Friday, January 29, 2016 at 6:21:21 AM UTC-6, Ulli Horlacher wrote: > > I nearly gave up with Python at the very beginning before > > I realised that OO-programming is optional in Python! :-) > > Most tutorials I found so far makes OO mandatory. > > Just more evidence that old dogs are incapable of learning > new tricks. Either learn how to wield Neuroplasticity to > your advantage, or go curl up into a ball and wait for death > to come.
Regarding neuroplasticity especially in programming you may find this useful: http://blog.languager.org/2016/01/primacy.html > People who are unwilling to "expanding their intellectual horizons" make me > sick!!! Yes! And as functional programming becomes more mainstream, OO-fanboys may need some urgent graft of plastic, see: http://blog.languager.org/2015/06/functional-programming-moving-target.html -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
