On 1/7/2016 7:44 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jan 2016 10:55:38 -0800, Glenn Linderman <v+pyt...@g.nevcal.com>
declaimed the following:

But all the touched files are .pyc files (and the directories
__pycache__ directories).  None of the source files were modified. So
why would any .pyc files ever be updated if the source files are not?
Are there _any_  Python-specific reasons?

        Two different versions of Python accessing the same modules? That might
induce one to do a rebuild of the .pyc from the .py... Especially if the
variant is something being run (directly or indirectly) from some scheduled
task.

Thanks for the idea, but there is only one version of Python installed in that directory structure (and all of my "shared host" portion of the server).

        Some conflict with a backup process corrupting files?

This seems more possible, simply because I don't understand their backup process. Still, if Python only reads shared, and there'd be no reason for a backup process to do more than read shared, there shouldn't be a conflict...

But it seems clear that there _is_ some conflict or some mysterious bug that is triggering something.

The installation happened really fast, when I did it, many many files seem to have the same timestamp. Maybe some of the sources are really close in touch time to the .pyc? But still, it seems that would have been resolved long ago... But I could go "touch" all the .pyc to give them nice new timestamps?

Maybe I should mark all the current .pyc read-only even to myself? That would prevent them from being rebuilt by Python, and maybe when whatever goes wrong goes wrong, an error would return to the user, but maybe the next access would work.... that'd be better than letting whatever goes wrong modify/corrupt the .pyc, so that _every future_ access fails?

Maybe before launching Python I should do a "find ~/py34 --name *.pyc > /dev/null" (or some log file) to cache the directory structure before Python looks at it, and give the mysterious bug a chance to happen with an irrelevant activity?

--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

Reply via email to