On Monday, January 4, 2016 at 9:26:47 PM UTC-5, Ben Finney wrote:
> Robert <rxjw...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I understand now, but I feel the args usage is weird. I don't see any way
> > to use *args and **kwargs in above code. What is your opinion on it?
>
> Can you show example code that you would expect, and specifically what about
> the actual code doesn't match what you expect?
>
> --
> \ "Of course, everybody says they're for peace. Hitler was for |
> `\ peace. Everybody is for peace. The question is: what kind of |
> _o__) peace?" --Noam Chomsky, 1984-05-14 |
> Ben Finney
Excuse me for the incomplete info previously.
If I call it with
a = f(3)
the result is 12. It is correct as below message. That is no use of *args
and **kwargs.
If I put more parameters in f, it will give errors as below.
///////////
%run "C:/Users/pyprj/ipython0/decor0.py"
f was called
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
TypeError Traceback (most recent call last)
C:\Users\pyprj\ipython0\decor0.py in <module>()
11 return x + x * x
12
---> 13 a = f(3, 4)
14
C:\Users\pyprj\ipython0\decor0.py in with_logging(*args, **kwargs)
3 def with_logging(*args, **kwargs):
4 print func.__name__ + " was called"
----> 5 return func(*args, **kwargs)
6 return with_logging
7
TypeError: f() takes exactly 1 argument (2 given)
%run "C:/Users/rj/pyprj/ipython0/decor0.py"
f was called
a
Out[13]: 12
///////////
I don't see *args and **kwargs can be used by other way yet.
Do you think this internal function definition (with *args) is useful?
Thanks,
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
