Chris Angelico wrote: > […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >> Chris Angelico wrote: >>> […] Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn […] wrote: >>>> Mark Lawrence wrote: >>>>> On 21/12/2015 07:51, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>>>>> Chris Angelico wrote: >>>>>>> But it's been clearly stated that .format is not going to do away >>>>>>> with percent formatting, and all language of "new-style formatting" >>>>>>> has been removed so as not to cause confusion. >>>>>> Wishful thinking, twice. >>>>> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/python/dev/969817 >>>> What is this supposed to be evidence of? >>> Proof that percent formatting isn't planned for deprecation, much less >>> removal. >> Then it would have failed to accomplish that. >> >>> There is strong support for it in certain quarters of python-dev. […] >> There *was*. The referred thread is from 2012-02. It is 2015-12. > > Then show some evidence that python-dev has changed in viewpoint.
And why would I do that? I have claimed no such thing. Your attempt to shift the burden of proof is unsuccessful. BTW, which part of “attribution line” did you not understand? -- PointedEars Twitter: @PointedEars2 Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail. -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list