On 19/11/2015 17:30, BartC wrote:
On 19/11/2015 16:01, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 12:19 am, BartC wrote:
You know, for somebody who claims to design and implement your own
languages, you sometimes go to a remarkable effort to claim to be a
dummy.
You write your own interpreter, but can't understand early versus late
binding? I don't think so.
No I don't; so? Maybe my interpreter can do its thing without being
aware that what it's doing has been called 'late binding' or 'early
binding' by someone else.
At least its default values work as expected!
Python's default values work exactly as I expect as the subject has been
debated at least twice a year on c.l.py for the 15 or so years that I've
been using Python. If your expectations are clearly wrong, that is your
problem and your problem alone. A solution to your problem is another
language that does meet all of your expectations, but as there is never
a "one size fits all" the only one that I can think of is your own,
whatever that is called.
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
