On 17/11/2015 21:27, fl wrote:
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 at 4:03:05 PM UTC-5, John Gordon wrote:
In <bad9ac66-38aa-4445-a486-6df0e9c77...@googlegroups.com> fl <@gmail.com>
writes:
correctly. Could you see something useful with variable 'sz'?
'sz' is fewer characters than '(n_iter,)', which may make your code easier
to read.
The np.zeros() function explicitly accepts an 'int or sequence of ints',
so you don't specifically need a sequence. Is the same true for the
'size' keyword argument of np.random.normal()?
--
John Gordon A is for Amy, who fell down the stairs
@panix.com B is for Basil, assaulted by bears
-- Edward Gorey, "The Gashlycrumb Tinies"
Hi, I get the following for the third parameter of np.random.normal():
size : int or tuple of ints, optional
I still don't see the necessity of 'sz'. Thanks,
I don't see the necessity for you to bombard this list with question
after question without bothering to try and provide your own answers
first. Did your last skivvy die of overwork?
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
