On Wed, 03 Aug 2005 09:35:08 +0200, Christoph Zwerschke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Some (many?) people don't like the unittest module, because it is not very >> pythonic - nothing to wonder as it has its root in the Java world. That's >> probably one of the reasons why there are other (more pythonic) unittesting >> frameworks for Python out there. > >So I think it would have been better that "unittest" had been named >"PUnit" to make clear that it is a JUnit port and to allow a more >pythonic testing framework to be added to the Python's standard lib.
Not a bad idea. -- Email: zen19725 at zen dot co dot uk -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
