Magnus Lycka wrote: > On Windows, you're likely to prefer time.clock(), to > measure relative times, since time.time() will have too low resolution > for measuring short thingies.
Specifically, using the NT/XP family of Windows operating systems time.time() has a resolution of approximately 0.015 seconds (I believe it might be exactly 1/64 second, but it should be easy to confirm with a google search). -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
